If you find an error
Send the headline or URL, the precise statement you believe is wrong, and a supporting primary source where possible. Disagreement is not the same as factual error, but every evidence-based complaint is logged and reviewed.
- Mark the message urgent where safety or continuing harm is involved.
- Contact us before sending confidential material; do not attach sensitive files to a general form.
- A good-faith correction request does not require public identification.
Levels of correction
Spelling or presentation changes that do not alter meaning may be fixed without a note. Changes to numbers, names, quotations, chronology or conclusions receive a visible correction note. If the premise fails entirely, the story is withdrawn while its URL and explanation remain.
Review process
An accountable editor compares the published evidence, original notes and new material. An author does not resolve a disputed story alone. The decision records what was checked; significant corrections are repeated through social or newsletter distribution.
Public correction log
No material correction has yet been recorded in this new edition. The first one will appear here with date, story, change and reason. An empty log is not a claim of perfection; it is simply the current state of the record.